Tuesday, 18 February 2014

Oz the Great and Powerful (2013)

File:Oz - The Great and Powerful Poster.jpgSo I recently went to see Wicked the musical at the Milton Keynes Theatre. And I have to say it was fantastic, the acting was brilliant, the songs were excellent, it truly had the passion and energy to be magnificent. If you get the chance do not pass it up. But for now, it's been less than a week and I miss the show and, unfortunately Wicked doesn't appear to be on DVD like Les Miserables, so I decided to get 'Oz the Great and Powerful' to help ease the burden.

It's not the same.

Oscar Diggs (James Franco), "Oz" to his mates, ends up travelling to Oz (what a coincidence that Oz's nickname matches the name of the place). Here he meets Theodora (Mila Kunis) and Evanora (Rachel Weisz) who ask him to kill the Wicked Witch (Michelle Williams), but is everything all that it seems?

This film is kinda weird. And not in the Oz-weirdness that we're used to in 'The Wizard of Oz' or Wicked, no, this film is just weird. I mean, for the first ten, fifteen minutes or so when Oz is in our world, it's black and white and the screen is small. I can understand why it's black and white, the 1939 film started off the same way, identifying the normality and, in some cases, the dullness of our world, before going to the bright and exciting world of Oz. The land, not the character. But, why was the screen small? Was the film making fun of what TV's were like sixty, seventy, eighty years ago? There was no real need to make the screen so small.

Now, it doesn't really help that the characters don't seem real. Oh, I know the film involves witches, porcelain dolls, flying baboons, and munchkins, but that's beside the point. No-one seems suited for their roles, and that's a damn shame because I know these people can act. Rachel Weisz, Mila Kunis, James Franco, Michelle Williams, these people can act. The problem is they're portraying characters they shouldn't be playing. Well, okay, Williams is actually believable in her role and Franco the......second closest, but no-one else can really match them.

Not only that, but the surroundings don't look real. If you look back at the 1939 film, everything looks real, the sets looked believable, for the time it was made anyway. You look at this film, and it looks painfully obvious that they are performing in front of a giant green screen. Not just that, but anything that isn't humanoid looks fake.

And it definitely doesn't help that the plot is all over the place. After a slow start it suddenly goes into overdrive and jumps from place to place, plot point to plot point. You learn a fair bit about Oz before he goes to...Oz...seriously, that's the problem with naming your title character the same as the location of the film. Anyway, we learn a fair bit about his life before he goes to Oz, but there's only really two points which come up again when he goes to Oz, neither of which are really that effective, it's not like the the lessons that Dorothy learns when she goes to Oz, they're more minor inconveniences for Oz.

So let's see. The acting is off, the characters aren't good, the story is all over the place, everything looks fake, and yet I still want to watch this film again. Yeah, it's really bizarre, but despite the flaws it's still quite an enjoyable film to watch. It seems to be one of those films where it's so bad it's good. It's got a certain knack, a certain feeling to it, you want to continue watching it. Maybe it's some references to the 'The Wizard of Oz', but then again 'Wicked' did that also to a better effect.

So, this is bad. The film is exceedingly bad, there's no denying it. The acting is off, the characters are bland, the story feels rushed at times, the effects look bad, and yet it has that certain something which actually doesn't make the film horrendous. Although, there is...one certain aspect of the film which makes you wonder why. See the spoiler section below.










Spoiler Section

Mila Kunis in the Wicked Witch! Of the West anyway. Rachel Weisz is the Wicked Witch of the East, Michelle Williams is the Good Witch of the North. And they thought we wouldn't notice?! I mean, sure, Oz wouldn't know that Evanora and Theodora were the Wicked Witches, but seriously? Did you really expect that a large part of your audience hadn't watched the original film that came out 80 years ago? The fact that Evanora and Theodora wore dark clothes while the "evil" Glinda wore white? I mean look at your promotional poster!
File:Oz - The Great and Powerful Poster.jpg
Right there!
You're showing the "twist" in your bloody poster!

Course, Theodora is also wearing white, which is actually quite good since part of the film focuses on the battle of her soul between the forces of good and her evil sister. And the film does show a pretty smart reference to the original film when Theodora's tears cause her skin to crack, due to her weakness to water. And here I thought she was a Xenomorph.

And of course this comes to the worst part of this film. Mila Kunis is the Wicked Witch. No disrespect to Mila Kunis, but, she is not a good Wicked Witch. No pun intended. Her anger doesn't come off well, her rage filled screams don't sound right. You know how I said in 'The Many Voices of the Joker' post that if you can't do the Joker's laugh you can't play the Joker. It's exactly the same with the Witch's laugh, and Mila Kunis cannot do the Witch's laugh.

But, you know how the Wicked Witch in the 1939 film was terrifying and scary?
The 2013 version is fucking hilarious.

Look, as much as I like Mila Kunis, the way her character was portrayed in this film was a mistake.

Tuesday, 31 December 2013

The Children (2008)

Ladies and Gentlemen, it's the end of 2013 as we know it.
So let's celebrate it the only way we know how.
Getting drunk.
And then watch my review of 'The Children'.

Sunday, 29 December 2013

Top Ten Worst Films of 2013

And now it's time for the worst of 2013, and boy did we have a random selection this year. We've had films about animals, shellfish people, zombies, pretend zombies, ghosts, and...Movie 43.

10. World War Z

I'll be honest. Originally I didn't think of putting this film on the list of worst films of 2013. As I said in my review, it's a crap adaptation, and on its own merits it's just watchable. But then, hearing time and time again from people saying how good it is, how "brilliant". And it's really pissing me off, particularly because it keeps making me think about how bad it was. Brad Pitt, was the only good thing in that film, the rest of bullshit. The fake CGI zombies looked crap, the story was rushed, the film is riddled with pointless scenes, and it brings nothing new to the zombie genre. For all the hype it remains one of the biggest disappointments I've ever seen on the big screen.

The Harry Hill Movie (2013) Poster9. The Harry Hill Movie

Speaking of disappointments. Then again, as I said in the review, did I expect anything else? Harry has developed a certain sense of humour which I knew was going to be hard to transfer from the small screen to the big screen. The thing is, it worked at first, but then as the film went on it got worse and worse. I think the point when it started going downhill was when Johnny Vegas suddenly started talking as the hamster Abu, but I truly lost it when Michelle the Shellfish humanoid turned up, from that point I knew the film was going to struggle. And it did. I wish it didn't, but it did.


8. A Talking Cat!?!

Yes, 'A Talking Cat!?!' is on this list. But then again, did we expect anything else? Looking back on it, I can remember some bits and pieces I remember quite fondly, like Johnny Whitaker's acting, the overall story, but that doesn't make the film good. The acting is poor, the story is just bizarre, the effects of the talking cat are just horrendous, and the characters are so bland I completely forgot about one of them. Or thought two of the characters were the same person anyway. Although, talking about this film has reminded me that 'A Talking Pony!?!' was supposed to come out, but I can't seem to find a copy.
Birdemic 2 is now officially on the way from America though.

7. Sharknado

"Enough said!", that was what sold me on this film, and boy was this film stupid. But, like 'A Talking Cat!?!', what did you expect? It's a film where science is thrown out the window, where the story is stupid, where characters are introduced only to be killed off, where the sharks looked fake, where the acting is...to be honest kind of adequate. Well except for one person. You see, I could have accepted this as a standard bad film, but Tara Goddamn Reid. I will maintain what I've said, Tara Reid is the worst actress to ever grace the silver screen. Even in the good films she's in she's bad! Julia Roberts does a better job and, as I said in my rant in 'A Talking Cat!?!', she has the acting range of a piece of cardboard! Anyway, 'Sharknado', stupid, but fun...ish.

6. Stranded

From the mind behind 'Battlefield: Earth' of all people. Wish I knew that going in. But then again I suppose it's more my fault for expecting a completely different film. I was expecting to see a psychological horror, instead we got a bland, lacking, and dull alien film. We learn virtually nothing about the characters, which is surprising since there's only four of them, in fact, I remember nothing about the film. Oh yeah, I remember the basics, but I can't really remember what happens. I guess it was that memorable. This film was just one huge disappointment since it should have been something else, something a whole lot better.


5. Spring Breakers

Oh boy I didn't like this one. I mean, wow. Jesus, God damn wow. It tries to be clever but turns out confusing, it repeats itself for no bloody reason, it tries to be unique but ends up causing headaches, it repeats itself for no bloody reason, the acting for the most part is rubbish, and it repeats itself for no bloody reason! James Franco was the only good thing in this film, just like Brad Pitt was the only good thing in 'World War Z'. The only reason why this film made any money I bet was because of young attractive girls only wearing bikinis for a majority of the film. I bet for every ten people you ask why they saw this film, the males would say because of the girls in bikinis, and the females would say they thought it was a comedy. But the main reason why I didn't like this, was because the main characters are the scum of humanity. I cannot see any reason why people should like them. The lesson this film teaches the audience is that if you can't go on holiday, GO ROB A RESTAURANT!

4. Infection Z

Oh Michael Madsen, this just wasn't your year was it? I mean, you had to star in a film which rips off the title to 'World War Z', starring infected people pretending to be zombies. But my God this film was awful. Awful acting, crap acting, no character development, poor story, terrible everything! Even if the zombies were actually zombies and not a mutation of Lyme disease, it brings nothing new to the genre, it's a repeat of 'Night of the Living Dead' only without the messages or the decent characters.
And yet it's still not the worst zombie film I've ever seen.


3. Paranormal Incident 2

Oh boy I wasn't looking forward to this one. I mean, what, with how pointless they made the first 'Paranormal Incident'. I mean, it's always a good sign that a girl shows her boobs within the first thirty seconds isn't it? It continuously mistakes the prison for an asylum, the characters are unmemorable, the plot, as I said in the review, has been done at least five other times, and the deaths and psychological aspects make little sense because we know nothing about the characters backgrounds. And to make it worst it's one of those films which says it's based on true events, even stating it's a "dramatic recreation", before stating in the credits that the whole thing is fictitious. Makes you wonder what the point in saying it's real is.
But hey, the ending didn't make the film pointless, so that's a plus.

2. 30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with the Devil Inside the Girl With the Dragon Tattoo

The worst thing about doing this list of the top ten worst films of 2013, is that it reminded me that I saw this film. Craig Moss is helping to kill off the spoof genre, with 'Breaking Wind' and 'The 41 Year Old Virgin Who Knocked Up...' blah blah blah, then again the people who helped make that genre with 'Scary Movie' seemed to be doing a good job killing it as well. Anyway, this film. IT'S NOT FUNNY. The spoofs, most of the time, don't make sense, some aren't even recent, the acting is off, and I was just praying that the characters would just die. And yet, there's one worse. You know what it is!

1. Movie 43

THIS MOVIE IS HORRIBLE! This movie is horrendous! This movie is God awful! Crap! Bullshit! Terrible! Bad!...Not good!...I've run out of words to describe this film! The overall story is confusing, the jokes are insulting, the film goes on for too long, and, despite 17 writers, it appears the script didn't know how people actually acted! Which is bizarre seeing as how this film had so many well known names who gave this film a strong performance for some unknown reason. Hell, if you open your January 2014 issue of Empire and turn to page 38, you will see the following quoted from Richard Gere:

"If you've not seen it yet, you probably don't have to. In fact, please don't. I'm telling you now: do not see it, it's not worth it"

How about this one from Hugh "I got testicles put on my chin" Jackman:
"You've got to keep trying to do different things and risk failing. Hey, look at Movie 43. Or don't! I've got two things to say: I'm sorry. And...I'm sorry"

It also has Stephen Merchant being a dick and saying:
"I just did it for the fun of being in a scene with Halle Berry. I didn't do it for your amusement"

Every single person associated with this film should hang their heads in shame! Hell, do a spiritual cleansing and burn a copy of the film!



And that was my list of the top ten worst films of 2013, let's hope 2014 brings us something better than 'Movie 43'!

Tuesday, 19 November 2013

Sleepstalker (1995)

Currently I'm planning to fix my schedule and get a whole load of backlog posts out, so if you see some coming up referring to Halloween, yeah, it was originally suppose to come out in October.
In the meantime, here's my review of Sleepstalker

Monday, 4 November 2013

Curse of Chucky (2013)

Chucky's back! I, am a big fan of the 'Child's Play' films. I really enjoyed the first three films, and while 'Bride of...' and 'Seed of Chucky' were pretty much the low points, I still enjoyed them. And so, after a nine year hiatus and returning to being mainly a horror film, we're now hoping for a great return for the killer doll.

Nica (Fiona Dourif) is a paraplegic who lives with her mother Sarah (Chantal Quesnelle). One day Nica receives a parcel, which turns out to be a Good Guy doll. So it's not long before Chucky's (Brad Dourif) up to no good once more and the bodies start piling up.

Okay, first things first, Chucky looks fucking creepy. Seriously this new version of Chucky looks soooooo....fucking creepy. And that's before he goes psycho. And that's mainly because of the effects, yeah the gore is standard I suppose, but the way the doll moves and talks is really good. It is also good to see Brad Dourif is willing to come back and voice Chucky, even after 25 years. There's only one Chucky and that is Brad Dourif. Granted bringing someone knew in would have been understandable, but after seeing the new Freddy Krueger in 2010's 'Nightmare on Elm Street', it will raise concerns. But Dourif does continue to do a great job as the doll from Hell.

The thing is, the story doesn't really feel new. For the majority of the first half the film acts out with the mystery behind Chucky, but we already know that he's the soul of a serial killer possessing a doll, it just feels odd that the film is tiptoeing around this. When Chucky does start moving about onscreen, that's when it feels right. Then they do some rewriting of the past which really throws things out of whack.

Now, the other characters...they're okay. They're not the best bunch in the world, but they've certainly got that certain something which keeps you watching. They are wonderfully acted as well, I do have to say that, with particular praise to Fiona Dourif, and Brennon Elliot for his portrayal of Ian.

In all honesty, it's a pretty damn good entry to the franchise. Yeah it's a bit of the tiresome old cliches you'd expect in horror films, and they pointlessly (and infuriatingly) rewrite part of the past, but it's still a pretty solid film. The acting is spot on, the story flows nicely with some nice references to the past films, and it's always a blast to watch Brad Douriff plays Chucky. A good return to form for the plastic killer.

Friday, 1 November 2013

Thor: The Dark World (2013)

The next film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has arrived and it's the God of Thunder's turn. And following everyone's love-it-or-hate-it feelings towards 'Iron Man 3' (Personally I don't see anything wrong with it), 'Thor: The Dark World' faced a bit of an uphill struggle to show the Marvel Universe still has it.

With Loki's (Tom Hiddleston) imprisonment following his actions on Earth, Thor (Chris Hemsworth) is bringing order back to the Nine Realms. Jane (Natalie Portman) meanwhile is trying to find Thor but comes up a weapon known as Aether, which causes an ancient race known as the Dark Elves, lead by Malekith (Christopher Eccleston), to rise from an ancient slumber. Now Thor reluctantly needs to join forces with Loki in order to defeat Malekith before he causes the Nine Realms to be consumed by darkness.

With this film we see a lot more of the Marvel universe being repaired after the events of 'Thor' and 'Avengers Assemble', primarily with the Seven Realms, with the reconstruction of the Bifrost and bringing the other realms back under control. But then again we get to the end of this, so we don't really see a lot more of the aftermath of Loki's actions.

While there isn't too much wrong with the story, it does feel rushed at times, mainly because the film hops around from location to location. It works late on in the film, but at first it's sort of meh. That and you feel most of the scenes on Earth, mainly the ones involving Eric Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard), feel pointless. But the film does flow and it does still manage to blend humour, action, and dark moments really well.

One of the main problems though is the relationship between Jane and Thor. In 'Thor', you can see a really good relationship between the two, in this one, not much has happened. Jane is angry one second that Thor took so long to come back to her, but then completely forgets about it a second later. Heck, the film seems to have been building up to a rivalry between Jane and Sif (Jaimie Alexander), but they don't even share a line of dialogue together. In fact the main relationship that is focused in this film is between Thor and Loki, which is done really well, particularly when Loki morphs into a certain figure. It kind of makes sense actually that the film focuses more on the relationship between Thor and Loki, it's certainly the one we care more about, but it makes the other connections feel dull.

The effects are good for the most part, the main problem is that they do look like they belong in a video game. But for the most part they do look stunning, in particular the Dark Elf ships and the fight scenes, especially the climatic battle. The Elves themselves look good and the scenes involving the Aether look well done too.

The acting is fantastic, everyone is great in their roles, though Hiddlestone leads the pack with his charm and prowess. Hemsworth does great as Thor and Ecclestone brings a great dark persona to Malekith. Portman, I must admit, I felt was quite anonymous. It's like her intern Darcy, played by Kat Dennings, had a bigger role than Portman did. I think it was more what the film did with her character rather than Portman's acting though, I want to stress that.

Overall, it is a fun film to watch. It's got the odd problem but it's certainly one of the better films this year has seen. The acting is great, the effects are fantastic, the story is really well done, and the battle scenes are brilliant. The strained relationship between Thor and Loki and the rebuilding of that relationship is the main focus point of the film and it is extremely well done, but that's not the only thing you have to enjoy in this film.

Thursday, 31 October 2013

Top Ten Scariest Moments

Happy Halloween!
So my next post is something I've always wanted to do, though there were a fair few problems doing this, including a busy schedule, editing software playing up, internet being slow, having to do re-shoots, etc etc etc.
But I hope the final product is still something for you to enjoy.
Ladies and gentlemen, here are my top ten scariest moments.