Sunday, 22 April 2012

Battleship (2012)


Those who have read my ‘Jack and Jill’ review, will remember that the review ended with this; “if it isn’t the worst film I see this year, something went terribly wrong”. Guess what? Something went terribly wrong. Oh God yeah! This film is WORSE than Adam Sandler getting dressed in drag!

This film infuriated me. But then again, I suppose it’s my own damn fault. You see, I was a huge fan of the game ‘Battleship’, it was one of, if not the, favourite game I had when I was a kid. For those who have no idea what the game is, it’s a guessing game. You play against another player, with the aim being to destroy the other players ships, five in total. You announce a co-ordinate, and if you hit the ship, you place a red peg on that co-ordinate on your side, if you miss you place a white peg. The ship’s controller meanwhile places a red peg on the section which was ‘hit’, until every section has a red peg, in which case the ship is destroyed.

THERE ARE NO ALIENS INVOLVED. Seriously! All you need, is one HUMAN fleet, against another! That’s essentially when I knew this film was going to suck, the second the trailer showed an alien fleet coming to Earth. But to be fair, I decided I should actually watch this film before I criticised it.

Granted the people behind the film most likely decided to go with aliens, rather than another nation, so they wouldn’t offend said nation. Then again, when the aliens displayed their technology, one guy on the American warship says it’s the North Koreans. Yes, he says North Korea is behind this. The same country that has only recently developed its first nuclear weapon back in 2006, and whose recent long range missile test failed horribly. Then again ‘Die Another Day’ shows they can develop a solar powered satellite cannon, so the fear is pretty understandable.

Anyway, despite the aliens, I can say they did do some little references to the game I liked, such as the aliens firing peg shaped ammunition. Oh wait, that’s it. Well, okay it’s technically a lie. The thing I was looking forward to, was some sort of variation of the line “You sunk my battleship”. The closest we get to it, is “They’re NOT sinking this battleship”. I hate this film.

The thing that really grinds my gears though, are the characters. I have not seen characters as stupid, bland, or downright irritating since ‘Nuclear Hurricane’. I need to explain some scenes to point this out. We’re first told about how a planet, similar to our own, has been discovered, and NASA sends a communication signal in order to see if there’s intelligent life. A NASA scientist named Cal (Hamish Linklater) says it’s like “Columbus and the Indians, but we’re the Indians”. How does he know this? He read the script of course! Rihanna’s character later delivers what is effectively the same line again.

But the thing is, NASA sends out this communication signal, but everyone is shocked and confused when they actually get a response! Why do you think you’re sending a signal into space you idiots?! I can understand the surprise of getting a response, but wondering why you’re getting one when you’re sending a signal into space is stupid!

Oh, and that’s just a minor supporting character, we also have our main jackass! Alex’ (Taylor Kitsch) opening scene involves him and his brother Stone (Alexander Skarsgard) drinking at a bar. Alex is drunk. Of course. He meets Samantha (Brooklyn Decker), who just can’t seem to understand that bars do tend to stop serving food at a certain time. I don’t know how bars in America work, but here in Britain EVERY pub stops serving food at about nine pm!

This is, of course, Alex’ love interest, and you won’t believe what he does. In order to get her attention, Alex goes over to the convenience store, which is closing and the owner says it’s too late. So in normal circumstance, you’d expect he’d give up right? Wrong. Alex BREAKS into the store, falling through the roof in the process, STEALS a chicken burrito, causes more damage while breaking out, RESISTS the POLICE, and promptly gets TAZERED. And bizarrely, Alex does NOT get arrested, as he’s at his brother’s place the very next morning. And somehow, all of this WORKS. Seven years later and Alex and Samantha want to get married. So that’s what I’ve been doing wrong, I’ve just been asking girls out, oh no, what I need to do, is break several laws and get tazered.

Following his law breaking, Alex is forced to join the Navy, and in seven years is already a Lieutenant. I admit, I’m not an expert on the military, but you’re seriously telling me that Alex has already been promoted to Lieutenant? Or maybe it’s like Rico in ‘Starship Troopers’. Oh, and Samantha just happens to be the daughter of the Admiral, played by Liam Neeson. I would say that Liam Neeson automatically makes this film awesome, especially since he’s the only brilliant actor in this, but he’s hardly in this.

You know what, I’ll talk about the acting here. It’s awful! Truly, truly awful! They’re all bland, there’s no emotion, no feeling. Except for Neeson, but again, he’s hardly in this. This film also marks the debut of Rihanna, and as you can expect, she is awful. There was this article in The Sun newspaper which was about Jackie Carrizona (pictured left), the ex-US Navy officer who trained Rihanna. You know, rather than spend money on Rihanna, then more money on training her, maybe you could’ve just gotten Carrizona! At worst she would’ve given the same performance as Rihanna! I think she’s more attractive than Rihanna as well.


Then again, I have to save Rihanna isn’t the worse actress in this, oh no, that belongs to Gregory Gadson, who manages to suck the life out of every scene. In fact, the veterans at the end (I’m not sure if they’re played by real veterans, I’ve heard they are) are the only saving grace in the acting department, even if was a bit corny. Wait, I just remembered, the USS Missouri, a decommissioned ship that’s now a museum, not only didn’t have its weapons deactivated, but it still has LIVE AMMUNITION!

Actually, that reminds me of another thing. Rihanna’s character and one of the veterans in this movie says what should be an awesome on-liner, but its ruined by the fact that they go “you mother(insert loud noise here)”. Will films stop doing that?! They did it twice here, twice in the modern version of ‘The A Team’ and even ruined the ‘Yippie Kay Yay’ line in ‘Die Hard 4’ by doing that. If you can’t do that line of dialogue, STOP WRITING IT IN YOUR FILM! It’s not smart, it’s just annoying and ruins what should be an awesome line of dialogue!

Following all this, and a football match between the US and Japan, at Pearl Harbour of all places, the US and Japanese navy’s go on a training mission together. At this time the aliens come to earth, and bring up a shield which blocks off all but three ships; Alex’, Stone’s, and Captain Nagata’s (Tadanobu Asano). One alien ship breaks off from the other ships when it hits a satellite, and ends up in Hong Kong, which is odd since in space we see it going in the wrong direction, unless the Earth was upside down. And still one alien soldier ends up in Hawaii.

By the way, these aliens are capable of creating shield generators and interstellar space travel, but their ships do not actually have shields, and in order to go across water, the ship needs to dive every so often. And despite these aliens having come from the planet which is similar to Earth and which Earth has been communicating with, they apparently evolved in a way so that the sun blinds them. Clever.
 
But the stupidity of Alex still continues to amaze me, as he sees that one alien ship managed to destroy two destroyers, but Alex still orders his ship to attack, despite Japanese forces drowning nearby.

And that’s not all the stupidity in this. Samantha is a psychiatrist, who is treating Mick Canales(Gadson), an amputee. While having a walk a couple of vehicles come by and tell them to get off the mountain trail, but Sam and Mick go up anyway because Mick “has never seen an alien before”, and only when they come across the vehicles from earlier having been destroyed, that’s when Mick says “We need to get off this mountain”. Nooo! Really? You mean when those guys told you to get off the mountain they meant get off the mountain?

Did I mention how much I hate this film?

The scenes involving Samantha and Mick also appear to intrude on the film rather than help it along, although, in defence, they (and eventually Cal who joins them) do actually prove to have a point later. This film actually has a few of those, the other one being when a kid asks what the difference between a destroyer and a battleship is, and Alex proceeds to explain that a destroyer is designed to deal damage, while a battleship is designed to take damage. I thought this was pointless, but it did actually help to solve what I thought was a plot hole later (namely why multiple pegs could take down a destroyer, but not a battleship).
 
Also, the effects aren’t that bad. They aren’t the best, but they’re pretty damn good. Well, the ships and the armour to the foot soldiers look really good, as was the motionless alien without the helmet, but the second we see any facial movements, well, they look terrible. There was one awesome bit though when one of the alien soldiers was shot in the face by one of the destroyer’s cannons.

Although, you know how films made by The Asylum are famous for re-using scenes? Yeah, this film re-uses scenes. I thought it was just me at first, thinking “I swear I just saw that shot a second ago”, but my mate the Whalley ALSO mentioned seeing the same shots! The Asylum I can understand, they’re the Asylum, the do it in pretty much every single one of their film. But this! This film had a budget of $200million! And  they re-used shots?!

The thing though, is that I don’t think the aliens were initially hostile. Yeah, the first thing that points this out, is that the aliens don’t actually do anything at first. The humans sound their ships horn, the aliens sound theirs...only the alien horn shatters the human ships windows. The humans fire a warning shot, which the aliens saw as an actual shot, and promptly fired back. Seriously, the aliens don’t actually fire on the humans, unless the humans fire on them first. This happens every single time there’s conflict between the humans and aliens! The only exception is when the aliens fires circular saw bots (Or whatever) on land to destroy a bridge, but by that point the aliens already feel under threat.

When it’s discovered that the crashed ship was a communications ship, the humans initially think that this ship is to bring other alien ships. No, I don’t think so. Because surely the aliens had already told others where they were going, I actually think the communications ship was to, oh I don’t know, communicate! The fact that they brought military ships with them, is what humans do when they try to communicate with aliens! Don’t believe me? ‘Independence Day’, ‘Mars Attacks!’, ‘Monsters vs. Aliens’, ‘The Day the Earth Stood Still’, ‘War of the Worlds’, several Godzilla films, etc etc.

Of course since this ship was destroyed, there was no way for the aliens or humans to talk to each other. One alien soldier turns out to be a Prothean and transmits images to Alex, where the aliens are at war with another alien race. Of course Alex thinks that the alien was doing an ‘Independence Day’ and telling Alex that the aliens plan on wiping them out. I actually think the aliens went to Earth to look for allies to help fight off ANOTHER alien race, and showing the images was the only other way for the aliens to communicate. Of course this is just a theory. I certainly feel that was the case though.

This has to be the single longest review that I’ve typed up, just to say how bad this film really is. Bland acting, stupid clichés, less than adequate story, and extremely unlikeable characters. And that’s the nice way of putting it. Not even my list of actors who automatically make a film awesome, in this case Neeson, can save this film! Still, we know what to expect when Hollywood decides to bring out the feature film to ‘Snakes and Ladders’, ‘Mouse Trap’ or ‘Monopoly’. MORE CRAP!

Oh God they’re bringing out a video game based on the film based on the boardgame.

Saturday, 21 April 2012

Mirror Mirror (2012)


Too be honest, I wasn’t looking forward to this film. The idea of taking a well known tale and doing a different take on it has been done, including ‘Snow White: A Tale of Terror’, ‘Snow White and the Three Stooges’, ‘Van Helsing’, as well as spoofs such as ‘Airplane!’ and the 2005 remake of ‘The Fog’.

That aside, I do not like Julia Roberts. Despite the fact that she has numerous awards, I think she is one of the worst actresses of all time. She’s bland, she’s wooden, she’s irritating, I just find her awful. Then I found that the dwarf characters had names like Grub and Chuckles.

So going into this, I didn’t really know what to expect. But in all honesty, I actually liked this. Yeah, I know, it’s bizarre. ‘Mirror Mirror’ finds Snow White (Lily Collins) being confined to her room by the evil Queen Clementianna (Julia Roberts), after Snow White’s father (Sean Bean) was killed ten years prior. The Kingdom is suffering financial problems, and the Queen decides to solve this problem by marrying Prince Alcott (Armie Hammer), who just happened to be in town.

While entering the land, Alcott and his assistant (Robert Emms) were robbed by the seven dwarves, which consist of Grimm (Danny Woodburn), Butcher (Martin Klebba), Wolf (Sebastian Saraceno), Napoleon (Jordan Prentice), Half Pint (Mark Povinelli), Grub (Joe Gnoffo) and Chuckles (Ronald Lee Clark). Alcott falls for Snow, so the Queen orders her minion Brighton (Nathan Lane) to kill her, but he decides to let her go free, where she meets up with the dwarves who train her to rob the Queen.

The acting is pretty good. Okay, Lily Collins could have done a better job, but she was pretty good. Hammer was perfectly casted as the cocky Prince. I have to give the way he fought Snow White in a sword fight a special nod, the way he talked and walked away whilst still fighting Snow who’s behind him. And then to humiliate her, he spanks her with his sword. Twice. Classy.

I do have to give Julia Roberts some credit though, she did an excellent job at portraying the Queen’s selfish, cold and calculating side. Yes, Julia Roberts did an excellent job playing Julia Roberts. I bet you were all just waiting for that. But yes, Roberts was actually enjoyable in this, not just as the Queen but as the Mirror too. Actually, I liked how they portrayed the mirror; a reflection of the Queen herself but wise. The Mirror is still cold and calculating, but the character itself is interesting.

But what really makes this film are the Dwarves. They’re funny, they’re competent, they’re just a whole lot of fun. They’re chemistry with the other characters is just fantastic and they themselves were interesting and well thought out characters.

The effects, well, were pretty bad. The castle and the wooden puppet monsters looked really fake and the creature of the forest looked mediocre at best. It was pretty good to see the facial movements of the monster, but overall it was lacking.

All that being said, the film does feel like its dragging. There is a feeling that the film is lacking in some areas and some plot points aren’t explained. What was this darkness that supposedly invaded the land? If people have gone through the forest, why do people fear it? (Spoilers) Why does the creature, when it was ordered to kill Snow White and was eager to follow its order, not? Why does the Queen create this creature?

It’s not the best film, but it’s that bad either. Give it a shot, but be prepared not to fully enjoy it. However, this does have Sean Bean in it, that alone makes this film automatically awesome.

Sunday, 15 April 2012

The Many Voices of the Joker


I’m sure I don’t have to tell you how big a Batman fan I am. I did after all do the ‘Top 15 Batman Villains’ and ‘Batman Live’ pieces as my first posts back in August last year, followed by the ‘The Batman vs. Dracula’ film and my review of the 2004 animated series, and you all know how the Joker is my favourite Batman villain, and that Mark Hamill is the best Joker ever.

Now following the release of ‘Arkham City’, Mark Hamill stated that that was his last outing as the Joker, and it was effectively cemented when the Joker was killed off at the end. And people complained more about the Mass Effect 3 ending (My review of Mass Effect 3 is coming). I then heard that, on Twitter, someone asked Hamill and he effectively said “never say never”. I really have no idea what’s going on now.

But after coming across his Twitter account, or at least ‘The Official Mark Hamill Twitter Page’, I found out about an online petition (On Facebook at least http://en-gb.facebook.com/pages/Petition-to-get-Mark-Hamill-to-play-the-Joker-in-animated-Killing-Joke/395872280428559?sk=info) to get Hamill to voice the Joker in the animated version of ‘The Killing Joke’. I should have mentioned this in the ‘Top 15 Batman Villains’ post, but I absolutely love ‘The Killing Joke’, it has to be my favourite graphic novel, so the fact that they’re planning to do an animated one has me really excited.

Or at least I think they’re planning to do an animated one, otherwise why all the attention? But I can’t seem to find anything concrete online; there’s nothing on IMDB, zip on Wikipedia, and I found some bits online about ‘The Killing Joke’ (I’m just going to refer to it as ‘TKJ’ now) being a possible future work. That and the fact that if the people behind an animated version of TKJ’ even have the idea of going to anyone other than Mark Hamill, well, it’s one of the twelve signs of the Apocalypse.

Granted, there have been plenty of other voice actors who played the Joker, so I suppose the possibility of someone else getting the job isn’t hard to imagine. There is a video on Youtube entitled ‘The many incarnations of the Joker’ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ql6nV7dgz6s&feature=related), which does actually provide a pretty good comparison between them. I have no idea which of these voice actors are still available, but this post is essentially going over all of them. Well, except for the Joker in ‘Crisis on Two Earths’, who they changed into the Jester. Yes it’s an alternate version of the Joker, but it just isn’t the same. If you want my input on the Jester, well, the character as a whole doesn’t seem to be on the same level as the Joker.

Anyway, we first have the Joker from ‘Batman with Robin the Boy Wonder’. Huh, I wonder why Robin got a longer part of the title. But anyway from what IMDB tells me, it was Larry Storch, who is described on IMDB as a “kinetic wiseguy”, and there lies the problem. No offence to the guy, I’m sure he’s a good man, but after listening to his Joker, well, he doesn’t sound like the Joker, he sounds more like one of the Three Stooges. His voice doesn’t exactly resemble the Joker nor sound that maniacal, so how can we find the Joker terrifying? I know that that was what the producers wanted at the time so that the show was more kid friendly, but it’s just the wrong voice.

And that’s kind of the same problem with Jeff Bennett’s portrayal in ‘Batman: The Brave and the Bold’ TV series. Though he does seem to portray Joker like a Shakespearian actor, it was played a bit more like you’d expect the Joker to be played. On top of that the ‘Brave and Bold’ series was more of a homage to the old TV series than anything else.

Then there’s Frank Welker. Now, if you haven’t heard of Frank Welker, where the Hell have you been? Welker has been doing voice acting for over forty years, having voiced the likes of Fred from ‘Scooby Doo’, Doctor Claw in ‘Inspector Gadget’,  and Nibbler from ‘Futurama’. Now, why I do think Welker is a living legend and very much love most of his performances, there are some which sound off. There’s Megatron in ‘Transformers’ where he sounds like he has a sore throat, and there’s the Joker where he sounds too whiney. He sounds too much like a henchman rather than a criminal mastermind, Hell, he sounds like Penfold from ‘Danger Mouse’!

We also have the Joker from ‘Young Justice’ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=No4HyDGQSHg&feature=related). Oh boy where do I begin? This Joker is voiced by Brent Spiner, and I had to find the ‘Young Justice Wiki’ site to find that out. The only good thing about this portrayal is it’s creepy, which is what we kind of want from the Joker. The bad thing is he sounds completely wrong. He sounds like he’s whispering every single line, every line sounds forced, and...he just sounds wrong! He sounds like a pervert you’d find hiding in your closet. This Joker has no chemistry, no hilarity, this is not the Joker everyone has come to love.

There are two others I want to go other before I get to Hamill. First, we have John DiMaggio from ‘Under the Red Hood’ (URH). Now, DiMaggio, who is more famous for portraying Marcus in the ‘Gears of War’ franchise and Bender in ‘Futurama’, did a really good job as the Joker in URH, he sounds like he could go from eccentric to psychopath in a second (Which, in fact, he does) and actually puts some effort into his voice. The only bad thing I can comment on, is that DiMaggio’s Joker laugh is a bit lacklustre, it sounds like he’s trying to achieve the right Joker laugh, but is being held back.

So yes, DiMaggio is a favourite amongst fans to becoming the new “main” Joker. But if Hamill has/does retire from donning the purple suit (In animated form anyway), I actually think that Kevin Michael Richardson should be the main man. He voices the Joker in the 2004 animated series, and I personally feel he does the best job beside Hamill. Richardson’s voice matches the Joker very well, especially the Joker’s eccentricity, and he has nailed that fine line between funny and insanity. While the radical redesign was something which many fans may not have liked, I’m sure you remember my comments on how the Joker now looks like Hitmontop, Richardson’s voice acting immediately makes us forget that. Again, like DiMaggio, I do feel that Richardson needs to work on the laugh; it’s not bad but it’s not great either.

To be honest, I’d love to play the Joker, the Joker is my dream role. Alas, I will never portray the Joker. It’s not that I’m not a professional actor, I’d love to get into the business so that others can criticise my acting skill. But I cannot play the Joker, because I can’t do the laugh. It doesn’t matter if you’re the worst actor or the best actor, if you can’t nail the laugh, you can’t play the Joker. Jack Nicholson did (To be honest) an alright laugh, Heath Ledger did a brilliant laugh, Mark Hamill, is the template for the Joker’s laugh.

Seriously, go listen to Hamill’s laugh, and you’ll see what I mean. If another Joker’s laugh does not meet Hamill’s laugh, then that Joker might as well be thrown out the window. On top of that, Hamill is just the best Joker ever. His style and energy to the role is fantastic, the voice is perfect. Mark Hamill truly brought the character to life, it is really hard to see anyone other than Hamill play the part.

So of course Hamill should play the Joker in the animated TKJ! There is no-one else on the planet who can be Joker in TKJ. While DiMaggio and Richardson are the best replacements, Hamill IS Joker, anyone else is a tragedy. If anyone other than Hamill is selected to play Joker, they will have extremely big shoes to fill and high expectations to fulfil. It won’t be fair on the actor or the animation.
                                                                                                        
Oh, and as an extra bonus, here’s Hamill saying “Why so serious?” (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CC8THtokVdg&feature=related). One note though, I do not claim to have made or own any of these YouTube videos or the Facebook petition.