Ladies and Gentlemen, it's the end of 2013 as we know it.
So let's celebrate it the only way we know how.
Getting drunk.
And then watch my review of 'The Children'.
Hello and welcome to the blog of the Film Interpreter, an internet reviewer who will look at anything put in front of him. Though I specialise in bad films, particularly horror, I will go into other genres, television shows and video games. You can also find me on Twitter, just look for FilmInterpreter.
10. World War Z
9. The Harry Hill Movie
8. A Talking Cat!?!
7. Sharknado
6. Stranded
5. Spring Breakers
4. Infection Z
3. Paranormal Incident 2
2. 30 Nights of Paranormal Activity with the Devil Inside the Girl With the Dragon Tattoo
1. Movie 43
Chucky's back! I, am a big fan of the 'Child's Play' films. I really enjoyed the first three films, and while 'Bride of...' and 'Seed of Chucky' were pretty much the low points, I still enjoyed them. And so, after a nine year hiatus and returning to being mainly a horror film, we're now hoping for a great return for the killer doll.
Nica (Fiona Dourif) is a paraplegic who lives with her mother Sarah (Chantal Quesnelle). One day Nica receives a parcel, which turns out to be a Good Guy doll. So it's not long before Chucky's (Brad Dourif) up to no good once more and the bodies start piling up.
Okay, first things first, Chucky looks fucking creepy. Seriously this new version of Chucky looks soooooo....fucking creepy. And that's before he goes psycho. And that's mainly because of the effects, yeah the gore is standard I suppose, but the way the doll moves and talks is really good. It is also good to see Brad Dourif is willing to come back and voice Chucky, even after 25 years. There's only one Chucky and that is Brad Dourif. Granted bringing someone knew in would have been understandable, but after seeing the new Freddy Krueger in 2010's 'Nightmare on Elm Street', it will raise concerns. But Dourif does continue to do a great job as the doll from Hell.
The thing is, the story doesn't really feel new. For the majority of the first half the film acts out with the mystery behind Chucky, but we already know that he's the soul of a serial killer possessing a doll, it just feels odd that the film is tiptoeing around this. When Chucky does start moving about onscreen, that's when it feels right. Then they do some rewriting of the past which really throws things out of whack.
Now, the other characters...they're okay. They're not the best bunch in the world, but they've certainly got that certain something which keeps you watching. They are wonderfully acted as well, I do have to say that, with particular praise to Fiona Dourif, and Brennon Elliot for his portrayal of Ian.
In all honesty, it's a pretty damn good entry to the franchise. Yeah it's a bit of the tiresome old cliches you'd expect in horror films, and they pointlessly (and infuriatingly) rewrite part of the past, but it's still a pretty solid film. The acting is spot on, the story flows nicely with some nice references to the past films, and it's always a blast to watch Brad Douriff plays Chucky. A good return to form for the plastic killer.
The next film in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has arrived and it's the God of Thunder's turn. And following everyone's love-it-or-hate-it feelings towards 'Iron Man 3' (Personally I don't see anything wrong with it), 'Thor: The Dark World' faced a bit of an uphill struggle to show the Marvel Universe still has it.
While there isn't too much wrong with the story, it does feel rushed at times, mainly because the film hops around from location to location. It works late on in the film, but at first it's sort of meh. That and you feel most of the scenes on Earth, mainly the ones involving Eric Selvig (Stellan Skarsgard), feel pointless. But the film does flow and it does still manage to blend humour, action, and dark moments really well.
One of the main problems though is the relationship between Jane and Thor. In 'Thor', you can see a really good relationship between the two, in this one, not much has happened. Jane is angry one second that Thor took so long to come back to her, but then completely forgets about it a second later. Heck, the film seems to have been building up to a rivalry between Jane and Sif (Jaimie Alexander), but they don't even share a line of dialogue together. In fact the main relationship that is focused in this film is between Thor and Loki, which is done really well, particularly when Loki morphs into a certain figure. It kind of makes sense actually that the film focuses more on the relationship between Thor and Loki, it's certainly the one we care more about, but it makes the other connections feel dull.
The effects are good for the most part, the main problem is that they do look like they belong in a video game. But for the most part they do look stunning, in particular the Dark Elf ships and the fight scenes, especially the climatic battle. The Elves themselves look good and the scenes involving the Aether look well done too.
Overall, it is a fun film to watch. It's got the odd problem but it's certainly one of the better films this year has seen. The acting is great, the effects are fantastic, the story is really well done, and the battle scenes are brilliant. The strained relationship between Thor and Loki and the rebuilding of that relationship is the main focus point of the film and it is extremely well done, but that's not the only thing you have to enjoy in this film.
Zombie month is back! And believe me, the list of zombie films is endless, kind of like the zombies themselves really isn't it? And let's get the ball rolling with a look at 2009's 'Dead Men Walking'; also known as 'Autumn', based on the book 'Autumn' by David Moody. I have not read the book, I have never heard of the book, so I'm going into this movie blind.
After the deaths of billions of people, so about 99% of the planet, a group of survivors attempt to survive. That's generally it.
I'll have to say, I barely remembered anything from my first viewing of this film, so I had to watch it again. And boy could I see why I couldn't remember anything. For a large majority of this film, barely anything happens. Even the zombies aren't much of a threat, there are even multiple scenes where the human characters walk RIGHT UP to the zombies, who do NOTHING. There's only a few scenes where the zombies are actually, somewhat, a threat, but the scene either doesn't last long, some of which are resolved simply because the zombies just magically disappear, or some questionable editing and camera work makes the scenes unclear as to what is actually happening.
This film doesn't take the action approach as most zombie films do, like 'World War Z', where we learn nothing about any of the characters besides Brad Pitt, and like 'World War Z' we barely learn anything about the characters in this film. Or rather they're portrayed as so uninteresting you can't focus on them and therefore care about them. And there lies the main problem with 'Dead Men Walking'. It tries to be in the same vein as 'The Walking Dead' and aims to make it more about character development, but the characters, Michael (Dexter Fletcher) and Carl (Dickon Tolson), are one trick ponies, everything we really learn about them is revealed in the opening. And even then it's never really brought up again; except for one aspect, but it's pretty much forgotten about until the very last ten minutes. In fact, the main characters are shadowed by a clown pimp (Yes, a clown pimp. It was a clown, dressed more like a pimp than a clown) and a man that Carl meets randomly, Philip (David Caradine), since we learn more about him, how he survived, and his God damn mother! In all honesty, I can't even comment on whether the acting was good or bad, because from the looks of it the characters were written that way rather than acted that way.
To finish off August I'm going to look at a film I wanted to review last year but didn't due to...something, I can't really remember what. So let's have a look at the film which MSN movies gave four stars.
Despite that, I really can't tell you anything about the characters, because I don't really learn anything about them. I know that Creek (Van Dien) is a police officer who has a personality which is somewhat not expected. For Stevie I can see shades of Drusilla from Buffy the Vampire Slayer but, obviously, not as good. The most developed character is Annie, but even then there are huge chunks of her you don't learn about. You do get a hint that she's an ice queen whose heart grows three times when she is forced to take care of her niece (Dakota Bright), but the niece is easily forgotten about it and is kept out of the film for a big chunk of it.
In all honesty, it's a pretty decent film to watch. It certainly has it flaws, but at the end of the day it's one of the better horror films of the modern age. The opening scene is the best part as it manages to develop the character and generate chills down your spine, but it then feels like it stalled and had to stutter back to life. If you have a chance, give it a try, but don't expect it to haunt your nightmares.
You know, I had so much hope for this. I mean, stranded on the moon? Speculation going into it of course, but running out of oxygen, nowhere to go, with fear and paranoia, unsure as to what's real and what's not. And then, on the box it says "from the Oscar nominated and creative mind behind Alien", and by that Roger Christian was nominated for best art direction which he shared with three other people.
And boy what a disappointment this was. I was expecting a psychological and psychical horror in the vein of the '82 version of 'The Thing', a dark environment, great character development, the characters not doing stupid things, that sort of thing. Instead we get a lackluster horror which held back its own potential. It should have been darker, more psychological. The premise of the film basically implies that the fear and horror is more what the characters think they see rather than what they actually see. Unfortunately the film doesn't even attempt to play with your mind. Heck, the film basically lays out what's going to happen, and it doesn't help that the film drags on like Hell. Now that I think about it this film seems to be ripping off an episode of Garth Marenghi's Darkplace.
It has been happening a lot with films I have been watching recently, but I don't really learn a thing about these characters. Oh as the film goes by I learn that Brauchmann is a goes-by-the-book kind of guy, and Krauss devotes himself to caring for his crew, but apart from that, they're a blank slate. And it's a shame because I like Christian Slater...simply because it's Christian Slater. As for the other three, you can kind of see them trying, but they're going uphill against a script that really doesn't like them.
My main problem with this was that I was expecting a completely different film. Putting this aside, the film really isn't that good. The acting is poor, especially considering Slater and Fehr are among the cast, the story is underachieving, the structure is bad, the effects and make-up are pretty good concerning the budget, but, once again, there's not much else to praise. Especially when the DVD tries to promote the director by saying he's the creative mind behind Alien. I wonder what else the directed has done?